Direito
URI Permanente para esta coleção
Navegar
Navegando Direito por Assunto "Abandono do lar"
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Resultados por página
Opções de Ordenação
Monografia Acesso fechado Usucapião familiar e suas repercussões na partilha de bens do casal(2018) Junior, Paulo Roberto GarciaWith the advent of Law No. 12,424 on June 16, 2011, a new type of usucapion was introduced into the Brazilian legal system, called special urban usucapion for abandonment of the home, or simply, family usucapion, legally provided by article 1.240-A of the Brazilian Civil Code. The legislative innovation has caused a several of discussions on the subject, especially on its specific requirements and the repercussions on the common property of persons who constitute a family entity under the law. The general objective of the research is to analyze the specific requirements of family usucapion, as well as to demonstrate the consequences that the granting of this type of usucapion can bring to marriage, stable union, homoaffective union and other forms of constitution of family entity. The method of deductive approach was used, starting from an overview for a specific analysis of such requirements. The method of procedure used was the bibliographic and the level of exploratory research. From the study, it is concluded that the issue is challenged regarding its requirements, especially the requirement of "abandonment of the home" since, from the analysis of several judgments, it is noted the difficulty in demonstrating this abandonment by part of the former spouse, leading to the rejection (of dismissal) of most of the actions of family usucapion pursuant to article 1.240-A of the Brazilian Civil Code. With the advent of the Civil Procedure Code of 2015, was materialized the possibility of requiring usucapion, in any of its modalities, through the out-of-court procedure, that is, next to the letter of registration of real estate of the region in which the property is located. However, the out-of-court usucapion becomes a polemic and controversial issue, because the law, when providing for the possibility of an extrajudicial proceeding, left some gaps as to how this procedure should proceed.